Archive for 2008

Earlier this week I had the honor of appearing on The Today Show for the fifth time, where I helped kick off the show’s annual Holiday Gift Drive. Thirty-two DSA member companies donated more than $9 million dollars in books, clothing, toiletries, toys and other products for families all across the United States.

Now that the adrenaline has worn off – and I’ve had a chance to reflect – this appearance, more than any other, has made me appreciate how much I have to be thankful for.

With so many families heading into this holiday season facing an uncertain economic future, the generosity of those who are able to give is critical.

I’m proud to work for an industry that gives so much back to the communities where they live, work, and play. Beyond the Toy Drive, to which DSA members have contributed close to $40 million over the years, many of our members are closely associated with the causes they support: Avon’s support for breast cancer research, AtHome America’s work on behalf of veterans, Mary Kay’s fight against domestic abuse, just to name a few. Almost every direct selling company dedicates a portion of their revenues to giving back – in fact some were founded with the sole purpose of supporting one or more good causes. Even when times are tough, direct selling companies find a way to make a difference.

I hope that you and your family have a lot to be thankful for this holiday season, and I hope you’ll feel free to share what that might be right here on my blog.

Happy Holidays!

I came across an interesting blog post today by industry critic Robert FitzPatrick. On his blog he recounts the story of Lasdwun N. Luzes – a fanciful economist who is described as, among other things, “a lobbyist for the Direct Selling Association, a fierce critic of consumer protection and a fervent anti-regulation spokesman.” The fact that no such person is a lobbyist for DSA is only the first indication that the entire scenario is a carefully-crafted farce. It turns out this sham character dates back to a 2000 April Fool’s hoax Mr. FitzPatrick engaged in for a publication related to the printing industry. What I find most telling about this particular literary expedition by Mr. FitzPatrick is what it reveals about his position on ethics. In short, if you don’t have facts to support your theories – make them up! Oh, and don’t forget to present the fictitious ramblings without noting that they are satire – that way you’ll fool a lot of people into believing what you have said is true, but if anyone ever calls you on it, you can claim it was all a joke. Nice.

Ironically, it is exactly this kind of deceptive behavior Mr. FitzPatrick accuses direct sellers of engaging in.

Anyway, in the interest of setting the record straight, I’d like to propose a more realistic alternative – one that’s actually true. Meet Bjorn Boss. Bjorn works for a small consulting firm in Anytown, USA. Bjorn is also an independent seller for a direct selling company. He works about 10 hours per week on his direct selling business and makes about $200 per month. It’s not a lot, but it helps pay the bills each month. He joined the company about two years ago because he wanted to buy products he was already using at a discount. After awhile, others found out he was selling the products and wanted to buy them too – thus his business began to grow. Maybe someday he’ll build the business into a full-time endeavor, but for now, he’s enjoying the extra income and the flexibility to decide when, where and how he runs his direct selling business.

The defining difference between Lasdwun and Bjorn Boss is that Bjorn actually exists – in the form of millions of Americans who are direct sellers. Some get involved for supplemental income, some build a business, and some sign up as a seller because they want to buy products they already use at a discount. There’s no cookie cutter description for all the Bjorns out there. That’s one of the greatest attributes of direct selling – it’s completely customizable to each person’s unique goals.

Critics like Mr. FitzPatrick will try to lump all direct sellers into one big pot and suggest that no one succeeds because only a small percentage make a full-time income. Not only does that completely misrepresent the reality of direct selling, but it disrespects to the millions of people who rely on their modest direct selling income to pay the bills each month. I’d like to see Mr. FitzPatrick look those people in the eye and tell them they aren’t successful. It might give him a whole new perspective on what “success” means – and for most, that’s not a 6-figure income.

I came across a blog post today by a guy who had seen a recent article on the increasing popularity of direct selling. He was bemoaning the fact that the result would be more invitations to direct selling parties or demonstrations. He’s right that the poor economy will probably encourage many people to explore whether direct selling is for them. There are tons of products out there that are of interest to people – especially with the holidays coming up. But what really caught my attention was his “warning” to people to decline the invitations. What? His logic is as follows: “The hard truth is that we do not need more broke Americans spending what little surplus cash they have on stuff they don’t need,” he says. I hardly think it’s fair to paint the U.S. economy that unfavorably – the majority of Americans are far from broke. In fact, I believe it’s his kind of pessimism that makes an already tentative economic situation worse. He probably has his mattress filled with cash, too. My logic says that in this type of situation you should get out there and do what you can to return our economy to good health – and while that doesn’t mean extravagant, careless spending, it also doesn’t mean hunkering down and becoming a hermit in your own home.

Here are just a few thoughts:

1)      Give yourself a “pick-me-up.” If the news of economic woes has you feeling down, you need to look on the bright side. The economy is cyclical – it always has been and always will be. Sitting at home a worrying about it won’t change a thing. If you are invited to a direct selling party or demonstration – go and have fun! It’s an inexpensive night out. If you find something you love, consider it a little gift to yourself. If not, thank the hostess for a wonderful evening, and on the drive home think about how you didn’t spend $25 for dinner, $10 for a movie ticket, and who knows how much for drinks afterwards.

2)      Be part of the solution. Most women don’t stop wearing cosmetics when a recession hits, just like most people don’t stop their health and wellness routine. For people who already buy these products, most will keep on buying. Others may even discover new brands because smart companies (direct selling, traditional retail or otherwise) increase their marketing during economic slowdowns. Research shows people are very receptive to marketing when the economy is slow because they are looking for signs that things are getting better. I say, don’t just look for signs – get out there and do something about it! When people start buying again, the economy is going to get better, so forget about putting your money in your mattress and be part of the solution.

3)      Do yourself a favor. A thriving economy is built on commerce. Whether a particular company has its products on store shelves, sells through mail order or engages a salesforce of consultants to market its products – the end result is the same – products and services are distributed to those who want them. There is always going to be a market for quality products and services – and direct selling gives people the opportunity to earn supplemental income while having fun at the same time. If you are looking for an additional source of income and are intrigued by the thought of doing something on your own, direct selling may be a good option. But, that doesn’t mean you should take the choice lightly. Be sure to set goals and thoroughly check out any company you are interested in to make sure your expectations are reasonable. Direct selling is, in fact, selling, so don’t expect the commission checks to start rolling in without putting in some work. And be sure to think beyond your immediate family and friends. While they are a great group to start with to get your feet wet, long term success will require you to get out of your comfort zone and market your products on a wider scale.

Pessimism fuels economic woes, and depriving oneself of a little fun now and then only makes the situation seem worse. So America, while the government is busy throwing billions of dollars at the situation, take the easiest step you can and change your own outlook. Get out there and have a little fun. If you happen to pick up a new shade of lipstick or a new centerpiece for the dining room table, all the better. Consider it a dose of medicine for both your psyche and the economy.

I came across an interesting blog post today from a freelance writer who has covered direct selling in the past. I respect her because she always asks really great questions when she interviews me and does a fair and equitable job of laying out the facts. While I hesitated momentarily on linking to this post because it focuses on a specific product from a specific company, the point is really one that’s much larger – it has to do with price and value.

Reporters often ask me questions about how the price and quality of direct selling products compare with that of their in-store counterparts. I haven’t done any research to assess price or quality of direct selling products, so there will be no dollar figure or performance assessments here.

But what intrigues me about Leah’s post is her description of how the kitchen shears she bought ended up being such a useful tool for her that she bought another pair to have around the house. Were the kitchen shears so special that every household in America should have a set? Probably not – but they worked for Leah. Could she have picked up a comparable set of scissors at Target for less? Maybe, but they may not have cut the same way, or been as versatile as Leah found her favorite set to be. The point is, those scissors have value for her and that’s all that matters.

She also mentions that she left the direct selling party she attended with some other gadgets that she hasn’t really used yet. She saw them demonstrated and had to have them. Trust me – I know the feeling. I have plenty of items in my closet that I might have seen demonstrated in the store or featured at a direct selling party. I don’t regret having purchased them, I just don’t use them as much as I’d like to – witness with proverbial treadmill or gym membership.

But back to the discussion of value and quality. I can buy a $3 lipstick through direct selling – I can also buy a $50 lipstick through direct selling. I can do the same in a retail store. I can be disappointed with the quality of a product I bought in a store – or be amazed by it. The same is true for direct selling products. In any shopping environment, there is never a substitute for the consumer’s ability to evaluate a product and make a purchase decision. I don’t care if you are in a busy mall or your best friend’s living room, the assessment of value remains with each individual consumer. What has value to me, may be outrageous to you – and that’s the beauty of having choices.

However, neither price nor quality even touches on what really differentiates direct selling from a traditional retail store – often, the extra value for direct selling products and services comes in the form of the demonstration and personal service.

It’s true, demonstration of a product, whether in a store or someone’s home, probably sways a lot of people to buy a things they wouldn’t have purchased if that same product was just sitting on a shelf with only its packaging to speak for it – why do you think grocery stores set up sample stations on Saturday afternoons? It’s not to give patrons a free snack – it’s so you’ll be exposed to something you otherwise wouldn’t have noticed and buy it!

So, the next time you are invited to a direct selling party or demonstration, look at it as the opportunity to be exposed to new products and ideas that you otherwise might not have noticed. Don’t feel compelled to fall in love with anything – but don’t sell the experience short, either. You never know when you might find the perfect pair of kitchen shears.

As baseball great Yogi Berra once said, “It’s déjà vu all over again.”

This week I’ve seen several blog posts repeating the tired assertion that 99% of direct sellers lose money. One even referred to the myth as a “cold hard fact.”
As I’ve pointed out previously on this blog, more than half of direct sellers report that their net income from direct selling, after taxes and expenses, is positive. In addition, positive net income is reported by nearly half of new direct sellers – those representing their current company for less than a year.
I’m sure this post will encourage the same critics who spread the 99% myth to respond to this message with the same information, that quotes the same circle of people, referencing the same “research” again and again. You can go back and review all of those previous discussions on earlier posts on this blog if that information is of interest to you. I won’t repeat it all here.
Anyway, my purpose with this post is not to spend more time debunking the 99% myth with dueling facts and figures. We’ve done that already. More important are the stories of actual people, average Americans like those profiled in a few recent media stories I’ve linked to below, who personify the success direct selling can provide – whether success is $200 a month or much more. Take a look at these examples:

Direct selling has carved out substantial niche

Direct sales businesses boom as economy tightens

Direct sellers strike balance, maybe gold

There are a couple of key points from these stories worth mentioning.

Not everyone in direct selling earns a six figure income, but then, not everyone is looking to earn a six-figure income. Many of the people profiled are seeking a little extra income in their spare time and they’re obtaining it via direct selling. As I am proud to point out, the median income for a direct sellers is about $2,400. The average income is actually significantly higher, but statistically speaking, the $2,400 number is far more accurate – that’s based on the millions of people just looking for (and achieving) supplemental income.

One of the other theories posited by direct selling critics is that if you’re not already in the business, it’s too late and the market is saturated. Not true. As the stories above demonstrate, successful direct sellers are entering the business all the time.

As I’ve said numerous times on this blog – direct selling is not for everyone, and just as with anything in life, there are people who will try it and not find the level of success they were hoping for. Anyone considering direct selling should clearly define their personal goals and thoroughly research both the industry and the specific company they are considering. Hopefully this Web site will assist in those efforts.

So, keep in mind that despite the stories in the articles above, success in direct selling is not guaranteed. But contrary to what our critics would have you believe, neither is failure.

It’s early September, and already the stores are full of Halloween decorations. Before we know it, we’ll be gathering for Thanksgiving and looking forward to Hanukah and Christmas.

It’s just about this time that many direct sellers are getting ready for holiday sales. In fact, many direct sellers do most, if not all, of their selling activity during this time just to earn extra money for the holidays or qualify for great deals on holiday gifts that they’ll buy themselves! Consumers are also finishing up their shopping lists and want to find interesting gifts – which they can do in a less stressful, more fun atmosphere through direct selling.

While you may not be able to avoid the mall completely, direct selling is a great way to get a jump on your shopping list. And consider this:

* Instead of driving circles around a mall parking lot, you can park in your host’s driveway.
* Instead of battling the crowds, you can relax with family or friends and take your time perusing the merchandise.
* Instead of standing in line at the cash register, you can fill out an order form at your leisure.
* Instead of lugging bags of gifts out to your car, your purchases will be delivered to your home.

Hard to argue with that! To see if the gifts on your list are available from a DSA member, check out this list of companies. Happy shopping!

With unemployment reaching 5.7% in July, (up to 10.3% if you include those who are underemployed), many people are raising an age-old question in direct selling: is it counter-cyclical, recession-proof, recession-resistant or none of the above?

The full analysis is a bit more complicated, but it is instructive to look at the last documented recession, which lasted from November 2001 to November 2002. In 2001, direct selling companies reported an additional 1.2 million sellers over the prior year, with anecdotal reports indicating that many of those recruits came on board in the last quarter of the year, post 9/11. (The average increase between 1990 and 2006 was about 656,000 sellers per year.) Sales showed a similarly positive performance as 2002 sales were up $2 billion from the prior year, far outpacing the average increase between 1990 and 2006 of $1.2 billion.

Certainly the data from one recessionary period does not constitute a trend, but coupled with the steady growth pattern of direct selling over the past two decades, the numbers suggest that when the national economy sours, direct selling can be expected to demonstrate its recession-resistant tendencies. During more stable times, direct selling will track more closely with the economy, a fact that has become particularly evident since 9/11.

But back to the unemployment rate. A side-by-side comparison of direct sellers vs. the unemployment rate reveals that high unemployment doesn’t result in a mushrooming of direct sellers as a counter-cyclical argument would suggest. Instead, over the past decade the number of direct sellers has increased as unemployment has decreased, except for the 2001-2002 recessionary period following 9/11 when the number of sellers increased markedly during rising unemployment. This further supports the theory that a true recession causes a strengthening of direct selling numbers, whereas other economic situations result in a closer tie between performance of the direct selling sector and the economy.

So what about our current situation? Sales and salesforce numbers for 2007 showed the first declines in more than two decades. At the same time some companies are reporting solid sales and recruiting numbers while others are noting decreased sales. In addition, economists are still undecided if we are truly in a recessionary period. Can we predict that the worst is behind us, or is direct selling tied so closely to economic performance that we can expect the roller coaster ride to continue unless a documented recession occurs? Only time will tell.

I’ve received several questions about the process used to review and approve companies for membership and I think it’s an important topic to explore so consumers can get a better understanding of what DSA membership really means.

After submission of a membership application the pending process takes at least one year. There are three main things that happen during this period:

1) DSA reviews company materials, including a starter kit and other documents that represent what a potential recruit would receive, to ensure compliance with the DSA Code of Ethics. Does the company offer a 90% buyback policy? Are the startup costs reasonable? Are there any statements that indicate inventory loading or other prohibited practices?

2) DSA makes inquiries to law enforcement and consumer protection agencies such as the Attorney General in the state where the company is located, the Better Business Bureau, and on a case-by-case basis any other entity that may have relevant information to share. It is also important to note that the mere existence of a complaint with any of these bodies does not preclude membership, but instead what is considered is the way any issues were resolved.

3) It is clear that the two activities above could be completed in far less than a year. However, one of the most important parts of the pending process is what is essentially a waiting period during which potential issues have an opportunity to come to the surface. These are issues that may not necessarily be obvious with a review of the materials, but are exposed by the marketplace over time.

Should questions arise from any of the three activities above, companies must answer and/or address those questions before the company can move forward to full membership. In fact, each year there are dozens of companies that make application and either withdraw their application or are not put before the Board of Directors for approval because of outstanding issues. Additionally, once a member, companies go through the entire review process at least once every five years (possibly more often).

I’m tempted to reiterate here the difference between a law enforcement agency and DSA, but that’s mostly embodied in my last post. What’s key though is that DSA’s review is not a substitute for one’s own review of a company and it also doesn’t guarantee that a law enforcement agency won’t disagree with DSA’s interpretation.

DSA has come under fire by industry critics recently as a result of a complaint filed against YourTravelBiz.com, a subsidiary of YTB, International, Inc., a DSA member company.

It has been interesting for me to recognize disconnect between the perception some people hold about the role of a trade association and the parameters under which a self-regulatory Code of Ethics operates. The questions have been posed to me in various ways – some more civil than others – but the questions essentially boil down to one: How can a company be prosecuted as a pyramid scheme and still be a member?

Using YTB as an example, the basic answer is easy – so far the allegations are merely that – allegations. Nothing has been proven – the company has not even had a chance to respond to the court. The Code of Ethics says companies cannot operate as pyramid schemes – it does not say they can’t be accused of being pyramid schemes. But the tiny little point about due process aside, based on the information presented to DSA at the time of their application, in DSA’s interpretation, this company met the standards of both the Code of Ethics and laws applicable to direct selling. Information presented by the California Attorney General may change that view, or it may not – that’s what due process is all about.

However, until information is presented that runs contrary to the information we evaluated as part of the application process, there are no grounds to revoke their membership. You can be sure, though, that we are keenly following this case and are evaluating information as we receive it.

Here are a couple more questions that have been raised:

What value does DSA membership have if a company can be prosecuted as a pyramid scheme? First, the standards of the Code are designed as a guide for consumers when evaluating a company – member or not. In the case of a member, though, if the Code Administrator determines a company has not met the standards, the company must make it right. DSA cannot guarantee that a company will not violate the Code, just like a government cannot guarantee that people will not break the law. But as with the law, there is a process for recourse when the rules are broken.

Does the Code process guarantee satisfaction for consumers? Of course the Code can’t guarantee satisfaction, but it provides an option that in most cases is exactly what a consumer needs. Instead of a lengthy complaint process with the Attorney General or Better Business Bureau, most complaints can be taken care of through the independent Code Administrator. However, if the Code process doesn’t yield the desired results, more formal legal action can still be pursued. I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather try the easy (and free) route before filing a lawsuit.

Why not kick a company out when they violate the Code? The answer is two-fold. First, a company CAN lose their membership if they are determined to have violated the code – either once or repeatedly. However, in most cases this is not necessarily the best course of action because the company is then not subject to the additional standards provided by the Code at all. From DSA’s perspective it’s far better to keep the company’s feet to the fire by enforcing the Code than by kicking them out, thus releasing them from the Code requirements. I’d much rather see a company reform than go somewhere else and continue to act unethically.

I guess in some respects I’m flattered to learn that DSA’s Code is recognized as such an important example of self-regulation. At the same time I’m disappointed to learn that there is so much misunderstanding about the limits of the Code. However, I view this as a great opportunity to evaluate public opinion and explore ways to both strengthen the Code and help close the gap between public understanding of the role of the Code.

There are a lot of questions circulating on the Internet and blogosphere with regard to the recent complaint filed by the California Attorney General against YTB, a DSA member. You can read DSA’s official statement on the matter, but I thought it would be helpful to weigh in with some thoughts that address some of the questions people have asked about what membership in the Direct Selling Association (DSA) really means.

To be sure, we are proud of our members and their collective efforts over decades to create standards for themselves regarding sales and recruiting practices. Those standards are embodied in the DSA Code of Ethics. The Code is not a perfect document – that’s why our Ethics Committee and Board are constantly evaluating the Code to reflect what we see going on in the marketplace. But the Code is an enforceable standard of behavior for our members and a mechanism that does aid salespeople and customers alike with getting answers to many of their complaints. Thankfully, despite millions of consumer transactions each year, we get relatively few complaints. That’s a testament to the standards themselves and the pledge that our member companies make to abide by them.

And that’s what DSA membership really means – that DSA member companies pledge to abide by the rigorous standards of the Code – that they will buyback inventory from departing distributors – that they will not allow inventory loading – that they will not require unreasonable upfront fees – that they will not make misrepresentations about their products or opportunities – that they will not be pyramid schemes – that they will not hide behind the independent contractor status of their salespeople to avoid application of the Code. And when a company doesn’t abide by these standards, it will be subject to the judgment of an independent Code Administrator who makes determinations that are in the best interests of the consumer and the industry – not necessarily the company.

Even the best of us make mistakes, and DSA’s purpose is to minimize those mistakes by creating the standards I’ve described and providing a mechanism to address them when they happen. But what about companies that are accused of breaking the law? Fortunately, DSA member companies are rarely accused of this in any credible way. But it sometimes happens that one of the hundreds of DSA members, or some of their millions of salespeople, are charged with serious, systemic wrongdoing. How can this happen and what does DSA do about it?

DSA’s process for reviewing companies prior to becoming association members is a rigorous one. It takes at least one year for applicants to become members. During that year, we look at company marketing materials, contracts, manuals, video and other items to ensure compliance with the DSA Code. We contact law enforcement agencies and others to determine what kind of consumer complaints and legal and regulatory actions have been lodged that might raise questions about the applicant. We will periodically attend company meetings to help ensure that the materials we’ve seen and real world practices of the applicants are consistent. If there are any questions about the company or its marketing plan, or any complaints that we’ve been made aware of, we ask the company to explain them. If they can’t explain, or won’t, we’ll defer their application or recommend to our Board that the company not be admitted to membership.

After approval, if a member company is accused of a fundamental wrongdoing, we take the allegation seriously. If there is an allegation, we forward it to our Code Administrator for possible further action based on his review and the evidence and conclusions that come from any government claim.

But DSA’s reviews and standards are no substitute for one’s own wisdom, caution and education about direct selling. Whether a company is a member of DSA or not, anyone considering direct selling should always ask the same questions – Is the cost to get started reasonable? Is the product a viable one that you think you can sell? Is the compensation of the plan based on sales to real users of the product and not merely based on recruiting other people? Are you being told that this will take hard work to succeed? Does the company have an inventory buy-back policy?

We’re confident that when you ask these questions about DSA members, they’ll be answered to your satisfaction. If not, the DSA Code comes into play. If a member company is not complying with the requirements of the Code or the law, the Code Administrator will take action to force the company to comply, help any individual complainant, or if necessary, ask the Company to leave DSA, make the matter known publicly, or refer it to law enforcement for action.

We’re proud of our Association, our Code, and our member companies and we know that the standards we adopt, fight for, and enforce are an important part of making sure direct selling is a business model that represents the best for consumers, sellers and companies.

I woke up this morning, looked at the calendar, and discovered much to my surprise that August is already upon us.

When I was a kid, August 1 meant another full month of vacation. Not any more. In fact, many kids will head back to school in three weeks – or less! Like many parents, I find myself with mixed emotions: a little joy at the prospect of getting back to a familiar routine, and a little sadness that another carefree summer is coming to an end.

This was reinforced on my way to work when I stopped at the store to pick up a couple things for my son’s last day at Art camp and saw that the entire front of the store was filled with fall foliage and Halloween decorations!

While I’m not ready to start hanging ghosts and goblins in my front yard yet, it did occur to me that while many people prepare for back to school, there are also many people who are preparing to start or reinvigorate their direct selling businesses in anticipation of the holiday season.

People become direct sellers to earn extra money for a variety of reasons, and the impetus is often seasonal. Fall is a time to work toward Christmas, spring offers a chance to save for a summer vacation – and summer sales can help pay for back-to-school clothing and supplies.

Similarly, direct selling is a great way to get your holiday shopping done early – why not beat Santa to the lunch this year and check off everything on your shopping list before Thanksgiving – all while having a great time and catching up with friends and family? Many people are busy right now setting up and conducting home parties and in-person appointments to help get ready for whatever the rest of the year has in store for them.

If direct selling is a part of your plans between now and December, please share your plans with us here. And, I hope everyone enjoys these final, precious days of summer.