<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Independent Contractors Under Attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.directselling411.com/blog/california-independent-contractors-under-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.directselling411.com/blog/california-independent-contractors-under-attack/</link>
	<description>Providing information to consumers and others interested in learning about and discussing direct selling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.directselling411.com/blog/california-independent-contractors-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directselling411.com/?p=149#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>The &quot;other working Californians&quot; you mention have taxes withheld from their pay based on a formula designed to approximate what they&#039;ll owe in April. The formula isn&#039;t always perfect, but it&#039;s usually about right.

The problem with withholding on independent contractors is that it&#039;s an across the board rate that doesn&#039;t take into account anything about the individual taxpayer.

California&#039;s own Franchise Tax Board has stated that a majority of independent contractors will be overwithheld - even at a 2 percent withholding rate. The legislature already knows that a majority of the money they collect will need to be returned so the net result is this is just an accounting gimmick for budgeting purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;other working Californians&#8221; you mention have taxes withheld from their pay based on a formula designed to approximate what they&#8217;ll owe in April. The formula isn&#8217;t always perfect, but it&#8217;s usually about right.</p>
<p>The problem with withholding on independent contractors is that it&#8217;s an across the board rate that doesn&#8217;t take into account anything about the individual taxpayer.</p>
<p>California&#8217;s own Franchise Tax Board has stated that a majority of independent contractors will be overwithheld - even at a 2 percent withholding rate. The legislature already knows that a majority of the money they collect will need to be returned so the net result is this is just an accounting gimmick for budgeting purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quixtarisacult</title>
		<link>http://www.directselling411.com/blog/california-independent-contractors-under-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-6022</link>
		<dc:creator>quixtarisacult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.directselling411.com/?p=149#comment-6022</guid>
		<description>These payments (although usually only representing a discount to people participating in MLMs) are considered income for tax purposes aren&#039;t they?  Aren&#039;t other (hourly)working Californians also required to have their income tax withheld until tax season?  Why allow a loop hole for these &#039;independent contractor&#039; types?  

Aren&#039;t many MLM aspiring independent salsepeople basically taught to ignore all the expenses necessary to generate what merely represents a &#039;discount over retail&#039; on products many of these &#039;contractors&#039; self-consume without ever seriously considering a resale? 

I think if I were a legitimate independent contractor in California (like a carpenter, realtor or taxi driver), I don&#039;t think I&#039;d like to have all these questionable MLM &#039;independents&#039; linked to my legitimate profitable business?  Hasn&#039;t MLM been rife with problems and scandal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These payments (although usually only representing a discount to people participating in MLMs) are considered income for tax purposes aren&#8217;t they?  Aren&#8217;t other (hourly)working Californians also required to have their income tax withheld until tax season?  Why allow a loop hole for these &#8216;independent contractor&#8217; types?  </p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t many MLM aspiring independent salsepeople basically taught to ignore all the expenses necessary to generate what merely represents a &#8216;discount over retail&#8217; on products many of these &#8216;contractors&#8217; self-consume without ever seriously considering a resale? </p>
<p>I think if I were a legitimate independent contractor in California (like a carpenter, realtor or taxi driver), I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d like to have all these questionable MLM &#8216;independents&#8217; linked to my legitimate profitable business?  Hasn&#8217;t MLM been rife with problems and scandal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

